[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Very emphatic -1 for r13369 (svn:keywords canonicalization)

From: Mark Phippard <MarkP_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2005-04-06 21:15:50 CEST

Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> wrote on 04/06/2005 09:53:06 AM:

> Max Bowsher wrote:
> > On this basis, I am about to revert the revision in question, and call
> > vote in the 1.2.x STATUS file for reverting it there too.

Just for my own education as to the process, what is the rationale for
reverting this change as opposed to just allowing it to be fixed? While I
agree that 1.2 should not be released with this change as is, it seemed
like it was something that could have had a fix made for it relatively
quickly and easily. Wouldn't that have been better?


Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 6 23:03:25 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.