[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Very emphatic -1 for r13369 (svn:keywords canonicalization)

From: Mark Phippard <MarkP_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2005-04-06 21:15:50 CEST

Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> wrote on 04/06/2005 09:53:06 AM:

> Max Bowsher wrote:
> > On this basis, I am about to revert the revision in question, and call
a
> > vote in the 1.2.x STATUS file for reverting it there too.
>

Just for my own education as to the process, what is the rationale for
reverting this change as opposed to just allowing it to be fixed? While I
agree that 1.2 should not be released with this change as is, it seemed
like it was something that could have had a fix made for it relatively
quickly and easily. Wouldn't that have been better?

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 6 23:03:25 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.