Re: [PATCH] new parameter option '--full-paths' for 'svnlook tree'
Marcus Rueckert writes:
> On 2005-04-05 13:46:18 +0200, Mathias.Weinert@gfa-net.de wrote:
> > What I wanted to say was this: 'svn ls' either works on working copies
> > on repository urls but not directly on the repository (which means on
> > server).
> svn ls -R file:///path/to/repos/subpath
> just my 2 cents
Instead of using 'svnlook tree --full-paths /path/to/repos subpath'
I can use e. g. 'svn ls -R file:///path/to/repos/subpath | sed -e
Now the only difference is the sort order and that svnlook will also
output the path itself ('subpath/') (what shouldn't be a problem) (if I
also needed this, why not using echo "subpath/" && svn ls... ;-) ).
Thank you to all of you.
At the end it's just a matter of 'inclination' (as Max said) :-)
Or will there be a difference in performance?
Received on Tue Apr 5 17:27:37 2005
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev