Re: Release procedures improvements.

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Tuesday, April 5, 2005 12:50 AM +0100 Philip Martin
> <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Yes. The name need not contain 1.2 or even subversion, it's a very
>> short-term label after all, it doesn't need to be recognisable. The
>> tarball can be renamed when the RM decides to release it, all the
>> signtures should remain valid.
>
> I'm concerned that we would then end up with two files that are identical
> in all but name. And, for some reason, that strikes me as odd. -- justin

Not really odd.

Yes, they contain identical bytes, but one is 'blessed' whilst the other is
not.

Makes sense to me.

Max.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 5 02:26:54 2005