Re: Win32 Tests -- locks-test

D.J. Heap wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> I'd say that an exclusive lock is an exclusive lock. If the pool that
>> "owns" the lock doesn't get cleared on error, then that's a bug. And a
>> good thing that Windows exposes it.
>>
>> -- Brane
>
>
> So you think apr_file_lock just needs it's docs changed to indicate the
> difference in behavior on Win32? Or the docs and behavior on Unix
> changed to match Win32?
>
> DJ
>
>

Also, it seems like we should make bdb and fsfs behavior match too...

DJ

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 4 04:08:54 2005