Re: Win32 Tests -- locks-test

D.J. Heap wrote:

> Branko Čibej wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> I'd say that an exclusive lock is an exclusive lock. If the pool that
>> "owns" the lock doesn't get cleared on error, then that's a bug. And
>> a good thing that Windows exposes it.
>>
>> -- Brane
>
>
> So you think apr_file_lock just needs it's docs changed to indicate
> the difference in behavior on Win32? Or the docs and behavior on Unix
> changed to match Win32?

As far as APR is concerned, the behaviour can be different, as long as
it's documented correctly.

-- Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 4 04:21:12 2005