Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>> On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:40, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
>>
>>> instead of new special-case functions, maybe we should export some
>>> general
>>> purpose client function to open an RA session, such as
>>> svn_client__ra_session_from_path?
>>
>> I used this function to test out the code fragment I posted. Making
>> this function
>> a supported interface would make me happy.
>>
>> Peter would you be willing to turn svn_client__ra_session_from_path
>> into a
>> supported svn_client_ra_session_from_path?
>>
> I'll apply a patch from you, if no one else objects. Just rename the
> function (removing one _), fix the docstring to be doxygen, update the
> call sites and all should be fine. I'll do it for 1.2 if it gets ready
> before the branch is created.
No, please don't, at least not without more careful examination. The API
should be more designed that that.
For example - right now, we have svn_client__open_ra_session() and
svn_client__ra_session_from_path(). Both create a ra session. We should
consider whether we ought to be exposing both, or (more likely) a carefully
designed merge of the two.
I'd be more comfortable with targeting this at 1.3, really.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 1 11:50:54 2005