Re: [Incomplete PATCH] was Re: Misrepresentation of BerkeleyDB FS module as "base"

John Peacock wrote:
>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> Yes, yes! You're totally right. Keep the module names, but maybe do
>>> a little sum'in-sum'in like this:
>>>
>>> * fs_base : Module for working with a Berkeley DB (bdb) repository.
>>> * fs_fs : Module for working with a plain file (fsfs) repository.
>>>
>>> But then, on second (actually, third) thought, I actually don't care
>>> to see the --fs-type-compliant names at all. Just looks ugly.
>>
>> How does the attached patch look (before I add the same code to the other
>> commandline apps)?

Uhh, John?

Take a look at r13761 - I finished off this issue 2 days ago.

Max.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 1 03:50:18 2005