[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: rationale for 'svnversion' (vs 'svn version') ?

From: Marton Fabo <morton_at_eik.bme.hu>
Date: 2005-03-28 17:53:23 CEST

John Peacock wrote:
> The revision number is an internal bookkeeping value - an artifact of
> the repository structure. It /can/ be used to denote a point in time
> for the repository as a whole, but it is much better to create a tag
> which can contain meta information significant to the developer (like a
> standard tag with the date/time embedded in the name).
>
> I'm not saying that your method is wrong, merely that it is not using
> the Subversion tools most effectively.

Sorry for my not really informed chopping into the discussion - but I
guess having to modify the repository itself just to capture a state for
the duration of a build script (which could just as well be captured by
reading a value and storing it in a shell variable or equivalent), isn't
a really efficient use of available tools and resources either...

mortee

-- 
The two basic principles of Windows system administration:
     * For minor problems, reboot
     * For major problems, reinstall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 28 17:54:40 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.