Re: swig and bindings for 1.2

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:04:21PM -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> 1. What is the state of our SWIG support as we move into 1.2? Which
> versions do we want to support, which versions do we not want to
> support?

SWIG 1.3.24 and pregenerate source in the 1.2.x tarballs.. Let's use
this as an opportunity to clean up cruft. We're going to be doing betas
for 1.2.x so we have a great chance to fix any problems before we do a
full release.

> 2. It would be really nice if the various bindings-maintainers can get
> them cleaned up this week and presentable for 1.2. There are new
> locking APIs, some new svn_foo2() APIs, a new notification system, and
> a whole new RA API.
>
> As far as SWIG goes, it should pick up most of these new APIs
> automatically. But there are some new func_t definitions that need to
> be manually thunked for each language.

Agreed.

> cmpilato tells me he's already working on the python bindings. Are the
> perl bindings ready?

Nope they aren't.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org