Re: FSFS as default for svn 1.2?

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> This has been discussed on IRC from time to time, but I guess not on
> the mailing list. Since we want to branch for 1.2 pretty soon, now is
> the time to decide it.
>
> Although neither back end is perfect, I think FSFS is less likely to
> bite new users than BDB is. As such, I think it makes a better
> default. It wouldn't have been prudent to make it the default in 1.1
> due to lack of maturity, but I don't think that is a concern any
> longer.

Perhaps we should first fix the bug Max Bowsher filed today whereby
one can load a dumpfile with bogus MD5 checksums into FSFS and FSFS
won't even complain? :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 22 06:53:21 2005