Re: autoversioning -- on or off by default?

John Peacock <jpeacock@rowman.com> writes:

> I know it's not possible; one of many things that a stateless protocol
> was never intended to support.
>
> <bluesky>Would it be possible to set up the autocommit to target an
> actual branch and then allow a human to bulk merge the changes to
> trunk (thus eliminating the log chatter)?</bluesky>
>
> I'm actually thinking of using the Subversion WebDAV support for
> storing corporate shared-calender files (Mozilla Sunbird project), so
> this is actually something I have some small stake in...

So, Ben is about to test a hypothesis for me that sez we can use

   <Location /path/to/repos/branches/locking-branch>
     SVNAutoversioning on
   </Location>

to get autoversioning working only on a certain branch. That would
help enforce the policy you are talking about.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 21 18:44:04 2005