Re: svn 1.2: The Reckoning

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> At that point, we have two aggressive goals:
>
> 1. Get everyone to seriously hammer on the locking feature for a
> week or so. We can fix bugs as we go, write more tests, etc.
>
> 2. Get /trunk stabilized for a 1.2-release branch and freeze.
> (Immediately followed by a 1.2-beta1 tarball, as usual.)

Speaking of 1.2, would anyone object to merging the Ruby branch into the
trunk for it? The last time I played around with the Ruby bindings they
seemed to work just fine, and assuming those who've been actively
working on them don't have any objection to releasing them into the wild
I don't see any reason to keep them on the branch much longer.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Mar 19 15:14:44 2005