On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Barry Scott wrote:
>
> On Mar 14, 2005, at 22:30, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >
> > No, I'm saying only that volunteers (thankfully) tend to de-prioritize
> > problems that generally have workarounds or that don't interfere with
> > the daily routines of the average user. For whatever reason, you
> > think 'svn cat' should work on both WC paths and URLs just like other
> > subcommands, getting info from the server only when necessary. I
> > agree. But is that problem more important than the massive list of
> > other bugs in the tracker? I dunno -- make your case.
> >
> Sigh... You assume I'm telling you to change priority. I'm not.
> I'm curious as to why the cat -r BASE problem is hard thats all.
>
OK, after looking, I don't understand why anyone thinks this is hard to
solve. It isn't. There is even a patch (which needs updating).
Regards,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 15 08:09:13 2005