Re: Fwd: 1.2 features: svn ls

Ben Reser wrote:
> Documenting and testing aren't really the problem.
>
> a) Several people don't think it's a valuable feature. You're not
> convincing them.

I see that the core Subversion developers does not have any dire need
for this feature. If just SVNParentPath gets fixed, the bulk of the
problem would probably also be gone for most people, I guess.

> b) Nobody has coded the feature.
>
> So you're welcome to try and code the feature and maybe if you code it
> right and there's enough demand the people who disagree now will change
> their mind. So far nobody has explictly vetoed it.

Coding it myself is the general idea.
Nonetheless, I'd still like opinion from the experts on how it could be
most sensibly achieved (even if the experts does not have a use for it).

> So please stop flooding the list with emails.

I'm sorry!
I'll tone down the volume of e-mails (from me) if it's bothering.

> You're not going to convince the developers to drop what they're working
> on to develop this.

Never tried to.
I apologize if that's the idea that anyone is getting from my postings.

> As always patches welcome. No guarantee that they'll be applied or
> adopted.

Of course not ;-).
If anyone has ideas on what the most sensible way to code this would
be, please mail me. Preferably off-list to avoid the spamming.

Thanks to all of you for all the input so far.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 10 11:38:16 2005