[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

mod_dav_svn input filter

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-03-07 23:46:18 CET

Hey Justin E. --

This is a followup discussion to our code-in-progress to send all
locktokens in the MERGE request body.

I'm utterly surprised. The request_rec that your input filter stores
the doc in turns out to be a *different* request_rec than is available
to mod_dav_svn later on.

I walked through gdb; the two request_rec structures have different
addresses, as do their r->pools. Yet they both look like they're
"MERGE" requests when I examine them.

How is this possible? What the heck is going on?

(That certainly explains why apr_pool_userdata_get() was returning
NULL. It's a totally different r->pool! The table technique would
fail as well.)

I've attached my patch-in-progress for you to look at.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Mon Mar 7 23:47:39 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.