[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Locking] Proposal to change ra_lock and ra_unlock to take lists of lock tokens

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-02-25 14:03:00 CET

On Feb 25, 2005, at 1:59 AM, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
>> The Proposed Solution:
>>
>> After discussing this with sussman and cmpilato, I propose that we
>> modify svn_ra_lock and svn_ra_unlock to take a list of lock tokens.
>> That way, each ra layer can deal with the tokens as efficiently or
>> inefficiently as necessary. Sussman's already got some ideas WRT
>> ra_dav
>> using POST requests instead of LOCK and UNLOCK requests, and the other
>> layers can just shoot the whole list at the server in one request.
>>
> +1
>
> We may want to consider doing the same for svn_client_{,un}lock as
> well.
> (The reason for not doing this in the first place was consistency with
> other svn_client_* functions.)>
>

Oh yeah, definitely. The svn_client_ funcs need to take a list too.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 25 14:04:25 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.