Re: locking: serious RA interoperability problems.

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> svnserve certainly *could*, but I'm not sure it would be worth it.

Fair enough, I was just asking. ;-)

> So yeah, I guess we're just trying to minimize code here. Normal RA
> layers ignore the new boolean field. mod_dav_svn pays careful attention
> to it, as a means of staying interoperable with the rest of svn.

And then the reverse case would be to just wrap the non-DAV comment in
<D:author something> here, even though that data isn't _useful_, but it
is at least "well formed" and the XML parser doesn't freak out.

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org