[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Making blame even faster

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-02-10 17:06:43 CET

Mark Phippard <MarkP@softlanding.com> writes:

> cmpilato@localhost.localdomain wrote on 02/10/2005 10:43:40 AM:
>
> > Branko ─îibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> >
> > > The more I look at your numbers, the more it seems that xdelta is a
> > > better choice. The worse compression seems to be balanced by better
> > > performance, which makes sense. Unless I've done something really
> > > stupid in vdelta or the combiner, we should probably look switching to
> > > xdelta in 1.2.
> >
> > +1.
>
> Doesn't it require a dump/load though? I thought that means 2.0.

I suspect we can simply teach the filesystem code to recognize (and
label) xdelta data in any new writes while continue to handle vdelta
present in existing places.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 10 17:11:12 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.