Re: Making blame even faster

cmpilato@localhost.localdomain wrote on 02/10/2005 10:43:40 AM:

> Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
> > The more I look at your numbers, the more it seems that xdelta is a
> > better choice. The worse compression seems to be balanced by better
> > performance, which makes sense. Unless I've done something really
> > stupid in vdelta or the combiner, we should probably look switching to
> > xdelta in 1.2.
>
> +1.

Doesn't it require a dump/load though? I thought that means 2.0.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 10 16:50:48 2005