Re: Locking: RFC: svn:needs-lock behaviors (Updated)

On Feb 3, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> On Feb 3, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Far better to force the user to explicitly break
>> the lock before allowing the commit.
>
> So your proposal is that when a new directory is added to a
> commit-txn, the filesystem should require token-authn for all locks
> that exist below the path, yes? (And of course, the locks would all
> be on nonexistent paths.)
>
> Good news, the fs is already doing this. Look at
> libsvn_fs_base/tree.c:2864 in the locking branch. I assume
> libsvn_fs_fs is doing the same. (fitz?)

libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c:2128.

-Fitz

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 3 23:30:58 2005