Re: "make install-swig-{pl,py}" implies "make install" for some libraries (Issue 2126)
From: Josh Lauricha <laurichj_at_bioinfo.ucr.edu>
Date: 2005-01-22 00:58:38 CET
On Fri 01/21/05 23:16, Max Bowsher wrote:
Though your points are valid, why not have:
Allowing everyone to be happy, install-foo would be something like:
so its not that much more in terms of code, unless I'm missing
-- ------------------------------------------------------ | Josh Lauricha | Ford, you're turning | | laurichj@bioinfo.ucr.edu | into a penguin. Stop | | Bioinformatics, UCR | it | |----------------------------------------------------| | OpenPG: | | 4E7D 0FC0 DB6C E91D 4D7B C7F3 9BE9 8740 E4DC 6184 | |----------------------------------------------------| | Geek Code: Version 3.12 | | GAT/CS$/IT$ d+ s-: a-->--- C++++$ UL++++$ P++ L++++| | $E--- W+ N o? K? w--(---) O? M+(++) V? PS++ PE-(--)| | Y+ PGP+++ t--- 5+++ X+ R tv DI++ D--- G++ | | e++ h- r++ z? | |----------------------------------------------------| --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Jan 22 00:59:44 2005 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.