Re: Release, bindings (Was: svn commit: r12731 - trunk/notes)

--On Friday, January 14, 2005 12:01 PM -0800 Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 11:54:39AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> Exactly. This follows the httpd convention: 3 developers must give a +1
>> to the official tarball before it can be publicly posted. If it fails
>> (or has a brown-paper bag bug), the version number is tossed and never
>> released to the general public.
>
> Tossing the version number is fine with me... It eliminates the need for
> renaming the files and eliminates kfogel's issue with not being able to
> allow anyone to test them.

Yes.

>> I really think that'd be an excellent idea and simpler than issue a
>> 'beta' tarball that reports itself as such. Post a 1.1.3 on dev@ and
>> wait until it receives 3 +1s before posting it and sending email
>> announcements. --
>
> Yup, I'd just like to expand the +1 to being a GPG signature. Helps
> fulfill my wish for multiple sigs.

I'm not exactly sure how multiple signatures would work in practice, but
that'd be a fine way to record who has signed off on it. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 14 21:15:59 2005