Re: Release, bindings (Was: svn commit: r12731 - trunk/notes)

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 11:54:39AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Exactly. This follows the httpd convention: 3 developers must give a +1 to
> the official tarball before it can be publicly posted. If it fails (or has
> a brown-paper bag bug), the version number is tossed and never released to
> the general public.

Tossing the version number is fine with me... It eliminates the need for
renaming the files and eliminates kfogel's issue with not being able to
allow anyone to test them.

> I really think that'd be an excellent idea and simpler than issue a 'beta'
> tarball that reports itself as such. Post a 1.1.3 on dev@ and wait until
> it receives 3 +1s before posting it and sending email announcements. --

Yup, I'd just like to expand the +1 to being a GPG signature. Helps
fulfill my wish for multiple sigs.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org