[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Ruby SWIG-based bindings

From: Max Bowsher <maxb_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2005-01-13 11:51:22 CET

John Lenz wrote:
> On 01/11/05 11:48:29, Greg Hudson wrote:
>> (2) Practically speaking, our situation with swig 1.3.24 will be much
>> better than it is with 1.3.21 because there is no runtime library to
>> depend on. Even if swig 1.3.25 changes everything, we won't have to
>> require that people have swig 1.3.24 *installed*, only that they have to
>> drop it into the build tree in order to build. And we can ship it as
>> part of our tarfile, of course.
> Exactly. If no one else tries, I will try and figure out and get those
> patches working sometime next week. I am just going to concentrate on the
> 1.x line, because I can't get the latest svn code working (what I assume
> is
> the 2.0 branch).

What you are saying is a but confusing.

The 1.x line *IS* the latest code, i.e. trunk.

If, by 1.x line, you actually mean the 1.1.x branch, then I should point out
that new features *never* go into patch releases, so your patch would be
unusable until it was ported to trunk anyway.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 13 11:54:04 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.