Re: [PATCH] Ruby SWIG-based bindings

On 01/11/05 11:48:29, Greg Hudson wrote:
>
> (2) Practically speaking, our situation with swig 1.3.24 will be much
> better than it is with 1.3.21 because there is no runtime library to
> depend on. Even if swig 1.3.25 changes everything, we won't have to
> require that people have swig 1.3.24 *installed*, only that they have to
> drop it into the build tree in order to build. And we can ship it as
> part of our tarfile, of course.
>

Exactly. If no one else tries, I will try and figure out and get those
patches working sometime next week. I am just going to concentrate on the
1.x line, because I can't get the latest svn code working (what I assume is
the 2.0 branch).

John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 13 03:15:09 2005