[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ra_dav->unlock()

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-01-07 16:12:10 CET

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:

> On Jan 7, 2005, at 8:56 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
> >
> >> But as a matter of completeness, it seems odd for our fs locking API
> >> to return tokens that "represent locks", and yet not have an API to
> >> lookup by token.
> >
> > There is precedent. The FS API can return node IDs that "represent
> > node revisions", but you can't query any other information using those
> > IDs. The API exists purely so you can compare IDs.
> >
> >
> So... is that a vote to remove svn_fs_get_lock_from_token()
> altogether?

If it isn't needed, then it just becomes baggage we have to drag
around. I'll let those with the knowledge say if it's needed or not,
but if not, then yes, my vote is for removal.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 7 16:18:58 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.