Re: ra_dav->unlock()

On Jan 7, 2005, at 8:56 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:

> Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
>
>> But as a matter of completeness, it seems odd for our fs locking API
>> to return tokens that "represent locks", and yet not have an API to
>> lookup by token.
>
> There is precedent. The FS API can return node IDs that "represent
> node revisions", but you can't query any other information using those
> IDs. The API exists purely so you can compare IDs.
>
>

So... is that a vote to remove svn_fs_get_lock_from_token() altogether?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 7 16:08:18 2005