Re: SWIG-Java bindings - what is their status?

--On Sunday, January 2, 2005 1:12 PM +0000 Max Bowsher <maxb@ukf.net> wrote:

> They haven't been modified in a long time - since before the branching of
> 1.1.x - have they gone the way of the ruby and com bindings, and should
> be removed?

I think they should be kept: I think dlr updates them when he gets a
chance. At the last I heard, he said they were functional for whatever
he's using them for...

> If they are still alive, then I'd like to tidy up the swig .i files. At
> the moment, java and python/perl sections are randomly intermixed. For
> python/perl, this is good, since the structure of the two languages
> typemaps is almost identical. Java seems to use a completely different
> kind of typemap, so I think it would be better for either the files to
> rearrange into seperate contiguous sections for Py/Pl and Java, or to
> move the Java typemaps into a seperate set of files.

I would say that you should have at it as you see fit. When dlr gets
around to it, he can pick up the pieces. =) -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 3 21:41:42 2005