[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

SWIG-Java bindings - what is their status?

From: Max Bowsher <maxb_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2005-01-02 14:12:49 CET

Issue 2168 is about each binding set having a paragraph documenting it's
status, so for that reason, a summary of the SWIG-Java bindings status would
be useful.

They haven't been modified in a long time - since before the branching of
1.1.x - have they gone the way of the ruby and com bindings, and should be
removed?

If they are still alive, then I'd like to tidy up the swig .i files. At the
moment, java and python/perl sections are randomly intermixed. For
python/perl, this is good, since the structure of the two languages typemaps
is almost identical. Java seems to use a completely different kind of
typemap, so I think it would be better for either the files to rearrange
into seperate contiguous sections for Py/Pl and Java, or to move the Java
typemaps into a seperate set of files.

Max.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jan 2 14:15:20 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.