On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> >
> >> + * what if older server? just returns '405 Method not Allowed'.
> > Those will be translated into SVN_ERR_RA_NOT_IMPLEMENTED.
>
> Um, I suppose so. Do we already do this throughout ra_dav? I don't
> think we do...
>
Not everywhere AFAIK, but for the new things added in 1.1 (get-file-revs,
get-locations), we do.
>
> >
> >> +RA->get_commit_editor2()
> >> +
> >> + * stash the incoming hash of tokens.
> >> +
> >> + * every time we do a CHECKOUT or PUT of a file path, look to see
> >> + if there's a token available in the hash. If so, put it in
> >> the
> >> + If: header of the request.
> >> +
> >> + * send *all* tokens in the If: header of the final MERGE
> >> request.
> >> +
> > How do you handle keep_locks? Separate UNLOCK requests? Or something
> > extra
> > for the final MERGE?
> >
>
> That's a question I've not figured out yet. I guess we should marshall
> the 'keep_locks' boolan to mod_dav_svn, so that it can potentially
> release locks after the commit succeeds.
>
Currently the other "servers" do explicit unlocks. For ra_svn, it is done
on the server side.
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 14 07:57:42 2004