[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RFC: Change "revert" behaviour

From: Max Bowsher <maxb_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2004-11-29 22:08:56 CET

Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Greg Stein wrote:
>>> In this particular case, the person doing the merges knows there
>>> aren't any local mods, so they could do something like:
>>> $ svn revert --skip-safety-checks --recursive .
>> No, no. It's not about whether there are local mods or not. It's about
>> the
>> weird edge case that there might be local mods, but the file time is
>> still
>> equal to that reported in the .svn/entries file.
> And the sizes are the same as well?
> +1 to your proposal. I'm not sure about the --paranoid flag, though. Have
> people ever reported problems that they have mods but svn doesn't detect
> them with the other commands?

Not to my knowledge.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 29 22:14:56 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.