Re: RFC: Change "revert" behaviour

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Max Bowsher wrote:

> Greg Stein wrote:
> > In this particular case, the person doing the merges knows there
> > aren't any local mods, so they could do something like:
> >
> > $ svn revert --skip-safety-checks --recursive .
>
> No, no. It's not about whether there are local mods or not. It's about the
> weird edge case that there might be local mods, but the file time is still
> equal to that reported in the .svn/entries file.
>
And the sizes are the same as well?

+1 to your proposal. I'm not sure about the --paranoid flag, though. Have
people ever reported problems that they have mods but svn doesn't detect
them with the other commands?

Regards,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 29 21:08:44 2004