[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Does Subversion run on OS/2?

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-11-12 14:35:32 CET

Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
> > Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
> >>Well, I'm torn between protecting any OS/2 users that we might already
> >>have, and trying to get out of keeping this work-around forever.
> [...]
> > Is it really hurting us? If we've spent a lot of energy on
> > maintenance, that's one thing. But if not, why hurt even one poor
> > user? :-)
> It's not measurably hurting us. It's just one of many small warts
> that I keep noticing. I don't like ignoring things like this, because
> they tend to breed. But I can shut up if talking about it is causing
> too much annoyance.

Oh, not annoying at all, I didn't mean to imply that.

I guess I don't see a danger of breeding here. We try to do things in
APR where possible, and having a bit of portability code in Subversion
isn't going to make us more likely to put *more* portability into
Subversion. If the functionality gets move to APR, then +1 on
removing it obviously. If it's not in APR, though, then my preference
would be to leave the support rather than make Subversion less
portable. (I won't complain again if you decide to remove it,


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 12 16:31:33 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.