[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Should all sub-commands accept a peg-revision?

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2004-11-02 19:03:09 CET

Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 12:43, Julian Foad wrote:
>
>>Is this part of your proposal:
>>
>> PEG defaults to the current working version if any TARGET is a working copy
>>path, otherwise it defaults to HEAD.

Oops - I copied and pasted the second half of that sentence from the
description of ":M" in "svn help diff", without thinking about its new meaning.

> I believe PEG is separate for each target, so that's an odd way of
> putting it.
>
>> M defaults to PEG.
>
> ... which means M could vary per target. But I think that's fine; each
> target is a completely separate diff operation.

Huh. I wasn't making a proposal, I was trying to get you to clarify what your
proposal was.

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 2 19:03:43 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.