[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Should all sub-commands accept a peg-revision?

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2004-11-02 18:49:45 CET

On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 12:43, Julian Foad wrote:
> Is this part of your proposal:
> PEG defaults to the current working version if any TARGET is a working copy
> path, otherwise it defaults to HEAD.

I believe PEG is separate for each target, so that's an odd way of
putting it.

> M defaults to PEG.

... which means M could vary per target. But I think that's fine; each
target is a completely separate diff operation.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 2 18:50:31 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.