On Tue, 1 Nov 2004 kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net writes:
> I'm not advocating rushing any of the new 1.2 features, especially
> locking (issue #1478). I'm more talking about defects. The 1.2
> milestone contains most of our remaining real-world scalability
> problems, plus various other annoying bugs. It would be very nice to
> get to a point where all those things are fixed, and only locking is
> left to do.
>
Would this mean moving new features to 1.3 and releasing 1.2 when the real
bugs in that milestone are fixed, or do you just want those bugs cleaned
before starting on locking?
There are some bugs that require new API:s (i.e. 2064 and possibly
others). Don't you think there are other bugs that could also be fixed in
an 1.1.x release?
Regards,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 2 17:14:15 2004