[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Should all sub-commands accept a peg-revision?

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2004-11-02 16:53:47 CET

On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 08:50, Julian Foad wrote:
> Objection: I don't think you can change the meaning of existing commands before
> version 2.

You mean, like we changed the meaning of "svn diff -rN filename" in svn
1.1 when we added history-tracking?

The rule you state should be taken with a grain of salt. There's no
excuse for changing an API function's signature so that every program
which uses the function suddenly fails to compile, but there are plenty
of good reasons to change the semantics of a particular call to be
better. Same for a command-line syntax.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 2 16:59:39 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.