Re: Should all sub-commands accept a peg-revision?

Josh Pieper wrote:
> Does anyone have objections to this change? Namely defaulting the
> ending rev of a diff to the peg revision if no end revision is
> present? I think it makes sense, so I'll go ahead and make it if no
> one objects.

You mean to do this for "merge" as well as "diff", don't you? It would be
confusing to make them different from one another.

Objection: I don't think you can change the meaning of existing commands before
version 2.

(When you add support for "@REV" to commands that didn't support it before, you
can have it mean whatever you like.)

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 2 14:50:39 2004