Re: Locking server implementation: libsvn_repos or libsvn_fs
From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2004-10-30 09:23:33 CEST
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> It seems like most of the smaller issues have dropped out of this
Change "easier" to "less work", and I agree.
> * Everyone wants to implement the lock-table (or tree) without using a
How did you reach that conclusion? IMHO if we put locks in the FS, it's
> * How 'svnadmin dump' deals with locks is also independent of where
Yup.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.