Re: Locking server implementation: libsvn_repos or libsvn_fs
From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-10-29 23:17:07 CEST
It seems like most of the smaller issues have dropped out of this
* The remaining 'big' argument for locks-in-fs is "it's more convenient
* The remaining big argument for locks-in-repos is "it's easier to
* Everyone wants to implement the lock-table (or tree) without using a
* How 'svnadmin dump' deals with locks is also independent of where
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.