[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: possible win32 fsfs performance[Scanned]

From: JS.staff <jsparrow_at_ecclescollege.ac.uk>
Date: 2004-10-22 23:22:53 CEST

Any time they're not open, if svn uses 'jars' in preference to normal rev files?

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Peter N. Lundblad [mailto:peter@famlundblad.se]
        Sent: Fri 22/10/2004 22:09
        To: JS.staff
        Cc: Greg Hudson; dev@subversion.tigris.org
        Subject: RE: possible win32 fsfs performance[Scanned]
        
        

        On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, JS.staff wrote:
        
> Shoudn't it be quite simple to protect the 'jar' file during production? ie:
>
> Create the archive file as 'something.x'
> When finished, rename to '00001-00999.jar' (fsfs uses jar in preference to normal rev files)
> Delete 00001-00999 ye olde rev files
>
        When is it safe to delete the old files on all platforms?
        
        //Peter
        
Received on Fri Oct 22 23:23:16 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.