On Tuesday 19 October 2004 22.49, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 08:18:01PM +0200, Sigfred Håversen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 October 2004 18.17, Joe Orton wrote:
> > > Sorry, I didn't mean to start a big argument. If you say you didn't
> > > copy the code, then I shall shut up, it just look{ed,s} like you did
> > > copy it but didn't understand the implications.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
> >
> > I asked you in another post what other part of the patch you are unhappy
> > about. You did not answer. Instead you made new insuations, despite me
> > giving you a link for the Postfix TLS patch. The link is even in my
> > patch. Several places.
>
> Please accept my apologies, Sigfred, I was not trying to insult you. I
> looked at the patch, I saw the "Adopted from neon" comment, and I saw
> the two functions beneath it with names which are the same as the
> functions in neon, with code which looked pretty similar to the code in
> neon. I jumped to conclusions, but clearly I was wrong and spoke out of
> turn -- sorry.
>
> joe
Thank you, and I appreciate that this misunderstanding is resolved. No hard
feelings on my part.
Regards,
Sigfred.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 20 18:02:55 2004