On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 08:18:01PM +0200, Sigfred Håversen wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 October 2004 18.17, Joe Orton wrote:
> > Sorry, I didn't mean to start a big argument. If you say you didn't
> > copy the code, then I shall shut up, it just look{ed,s} like you did
> > copy it but didn't understand the implications.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
> I asked you in another post what other part of the patch you are unhappy
> about. You did not answer. Instead you made new insuations, despite me giving
> you a link for the Postfix TLS patch. The link is even in my patch. Several
> places.
Please accept my apologies, Sigfred, I was not trying to insult you. I
looked at the patch, I saw the "Adopted from neon" comment, and I saw
the two functions beneath it with names which are the same as the
functions in neon, with code which looked pretty similar to the code in
neon. I jumped to conclusions, but clearly I was wrong and spoke out of
turn -- sorry.
joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 19 22:49:57 2004