kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > > Erk -- I see a lot of complexities here, as you can tell, but I'm
> > > gonna have to drop out of the conversation, Archie, sorry. Just time
> > > pressures, nothing else.
> >
> > No problem.. I'd like to file an enhancement request though (and point
> > it at this thread).. is that OK?
>
> Well, hmmm. I'd prefer not to, only because I don't really think
> there *is* a workable plan there (which must be frustrating, since I'm
> not spending the time to really say why). I'd feel better if you
> could find some developer who would say "Yeah, I'd implement that if I
> had the time" or "Yeah, I agree that's a good partial solution".
Oh nevermind, I give up.
I'm too busy to explain this idea again or jump through any more
hoops.. if it hasn't registered with any developers by now then it's
not of sufficient interest. I'm kindof surprised, but hey whatever..
inter-repo merging seems like a feature lots of people could use.
> Why not just toss the copy history entirely when doing a
> different-repository merge?
>
> Oh, there I go getting into the subject again :-).
That would be fine with me! I just want to be able to merge in patches
from one repo to another (not an unreasonable feature request IMHO),
even if that means history is not handled "optimally" for copies.
-Archie
__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 19 22:30:20 2004