On Thursday 14 October 2004 16:17, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net> writes:
> > Right again... It should be nearly the same comment as above, but
> > with files instead of directories. I apologize for the confusion.
> > I'll update that tonight.
>
> Thanks. Can you put the correcting revision in the 1.1.x STATUS file
> too, next to the original one?
Sure thing. Should I remove the Notes and the -0 vote you casted?
> > What's happening is that this function is a helper in crawling the
> > working copy. However, it didn't discriminate on things that had
> > been 'added' to the working copy when trying to export rBASE. What
> > ultimately happened is that the user would see an error saying that a
> > text-base file didn't exist. The goal of the code was that unless
> > we're trying to export rWORKING, then skip over anything that's been
> > added but not committed. Does that make more sense?
>
> Yeah, that's great! Something like the above paragraph might want to
> become a comment in the code, where you're doing these checks.
Hopefully I captured this in a more concise fashion in r11415.
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 15 00:42:47 2004