[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Locking UI comments

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2004-10-14 22:14:22 CEST

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Garrett Rooney wrote:

> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > That's a good idea, but then we'd have to maintain support for the new
> > --preserve-extensions flag after 2.0 (as a no-op). I don't believe we
> > are obligated to maintain the existing naming structure of this files.
> > Humans and scripts aren't supposed to be looking for conflict files
> > based on their knowledge of our naming scheme -- they should be
> > parsing the output of 'svn info' to see the names of any conflict
> > files.
> Umm, that seems a little unreasonable, since the format of those
> filenames is documented in numerous places, including both your book and
> mine ;-)
> I'm almost certain that someone is depending on that right now, and
> changing it out from under them seems like a bad idea.
Is it also documented that, if foo is conflicted and foo.mine (etc.)
already exists, then foo.2.mine will be created. People just depending on
foo.mine are already broken.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 14 21:59:40 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.