Re: "move" shouldn't take a revision argument

Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> writes:
> Ahh okay. So leave the current behavior in the command line client,
> mark it as depricated and remove it at 2.0.

I replied:
> Yep.

I originally proposed just ignoring the revision argument entirely
now, so that it wouldn't produce an error no matter what you passed.
On further thought, that's a terrible idea, and I never said it :-)

The current behavior is fine (and the error case *should* be an
error); we should just deprecate the -r option to mv in 2.0 as you
said.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 13 19:33:50 2004