[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Which commands are supposed to use the new peg version atBASE?

From: Peter Hercek <peter_at_syncad.com>
Date: 2004-10-08 15:57:08 CEST

Hi Greg,

Hmm, I thought I have not had access to this group since
 my post here did not appear for about an hour after it was
 sent. So I tried my luck once again in the user gropu and Ben
 responded.
Here is some more data about the log problem (may be there
 is also a small diff problem ... or I do not understand it):
http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svnusers/archive-2004-10/0423.shtml

Let me know if I should fill some issue for the log problem
 or the documentation problem.

Thanks,
  Peter.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Hudson" <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel
Cc: <dev@subversion.tigris.org>
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 00:01
Subject: Re: Which commands are supposed to use the new peg version atBASE?

> On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 11:16, Peter Hercek wrote:
> > Version 1.1 introduces peg version at BASE for cat
> > diff, blame, switch, merge, update, proplist, propget
> > commands.
>
> > It probably does not make sense for add, co, cleanup,
> > ci, delete, export, help, import, info, mkdir, move,
> > resolved, revert, status since they do not have any
> > BASE to take the pegged revision from or do not
> > have revision switch at all.
>
> I think copy might want to use a peg rev if you give it a revision
> switch (HEAD if the source is a URL, BASE if the source is a wc path).
> Likewise for export.
>
> > I'm not sure how it is with propdel, propedit and propset.
>
> No issue there.
>
> > Log command stays as it was (ie the path is searched
> > in a revision specified by -r argument instead of being
> > pegged to BASE). I'm not sure whether it was intended.
> > Is this intentional?
>
> I think that's an oversight or a mistake.
>
> > BTW, svn help move reports that move command can
> > use -r argument, but it looks like it is not applicable.
>
> How odd. Also looks like a bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 9 20:32:34 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.