Re: Anti-FUD: SVN ate my repository

Thanks. I'd agree that its not a BDB specific issue. :) Also,
"corrupted" is not the proper term to use. If DB is used properly by
the application with transactions enabled, if the database and log
files are properly maintained by the user and available for use during
recovery, the database will never be "corrupted". It is in need of
recovery.

If this isn't what's happening right now, we need to figure out why. :)

-greg

_____________________________________________________________________

Gregory Burd 617-869-0997
Product Manager gburd@sleepycat.com
Sleepycat Software, Inc. http://www.sleepycat.com/

On Sep 20, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Michael wrote:

> So I'd label the term as a general computing term, not a BDB/subversion
> specific term. Seems to have a very different meaning than "corrupted".
>
> Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 21 14:53:05 2004