[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Anti-FUD: SVN ate my repository

From: Gregory Burd <gburd_at_sleepycat.com>
Date: 2004-09-21 14:52:49 CEST

Thanks. I'd agree that its not a BDB specific issue. :) Also,
"corrupted" is not the proper term to use. If DB is used properly by
the application with transactions enabled, if the database and log
files are properly maintained by the user and available for use during
recovery, the database will never be "corrupted". It is in need of

If this isn't what's happening right now, we need to figure out why. :)



Gregory Burd 617-869-0997
Product Manager gburd@sleepycat.com
Sleepycat Software, Inc. http://www.sleepycat.com/

On Sep 20, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Michael wrote:

> So I'd label the term as a general computing term, not a BDB/subversion
> specific term. Seems to have a very different meaning than "corrupted".
> Michael

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 21 14:53:05 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.