[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r10835 - trunk/subversion/include

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2004-09-08 21:11:01 CEST

On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 13:18, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> This change was on trunk, so aren't we deprecating in 1.2?

No, r10835 was made in response to the nomination and approval of r10467
and friends into 1.1. Quoting from the erstwhile STATUS entry:

      HEAD as of r10734 shows the new functions as "since 1.2.0" and the
      deprecated functions as "preserving the 1.1.0" API. If these candidates
      are approved, then a new trunk revision, marked rXXXXX above, should
      also be applied to reflect that the changes were actually included
      in 1.1.0.
      UPDATE: r10835 is that trunk revision. Since the notional rXXXXX has been
      here throughout the voting process, adding in the real revision does not
      invalidate the votes.

> I don't understand this.

mbk committed r10467. He didn't expect his change to make it into 1.1,
so he said his new functions were new in 1.2 and (in r10734) deprecated
the old ones as preserving the 1.1 API. (You would argue that he should
have deprecated the old ones as preserving the 1.0 API, but I disagree,
as I argued in my previous message in this thread.)

After the esr thread, mbk nominated r10467, making a note that if it was
approved, the comments should be changed appropriately. The nomination
was approved, and r10835 is the comment fix.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 8 21:11:27 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.